<img height="1" width="1" style="display:none;" alt="" src="https://dc.ads.linkedin.com/collect/?pid=406649&amp;fmt=gif">
Skip to content
diversity&inclusion
Barry Gallagher9/9/20 12:00 PM8 min read

The Importance of Diversity and Inclusion in the Workplace

The Importance of Diversity and Inclusion in the Workplace
11:54

The Importance of Diversity and Inclusion in the Workplace — and How to Build It

Diversity and inclusion are good for people and good for business — but the research is clear that one without the other doesn’t work. Here’s the evidence behind the business case, the condition that determines whether diversity actually pays off, and the practical steps — including recognition equity — that turn inclusion from an aspiration into a measured practice.

Diversity and inclusion in the workplace matter for two reasons, and it’s worth being clear about both. The first is human: every employee deserves to feel seen, heard, and respected, and an inclusive workplace delivers that. The second is empirical: a substantial body of research links inclusion to measurable business outcomes — stronger talent attraction and retention, more innovation, and better performance. This article covers the evidence behind that business case, the one condition the research says determines whether diversity actually delivers its benefits, and — the part most ‘why D&I matters’ articles skip — the practical steps for building inclusion, including the recognition-equity angle that makes inclusion measurable.

The business case, with the evidence behind it

The benefits attributed to diversity and inclusion are real and well-studied. The table below pairs each benefit with what the research actually shows — because the business case is stronger when it rests on evidence rather than assertion:

 

Benefit

What the research shows

Why it happens

Attracts talent & strengthens reputation

Inclusive workplaces see higher retention; employees are 5.4x more likely to want to stay long-term (Great Place to Work, 2023)

People want to work where they feel accepted, valued, and able to succeed

Boosts creativity & innovation

Diverse teams link to more innovation — but only with psychological safety present (Edmondson, 1999; Google, 2017)

A range of perspectives produces better problem-solving — if people feel safe to voice them

Improves engagement & pride

Employees in inclusive workplaces are 9.8x more likely to look forward to work, 6.3x more likely to have pride in it (Great Place to Work, 2023)

Belonging and respect are core drivers of engagement

Strengthens performance

Top-quartile executive-diversity companies are more likely to out-perform on profitability than bottom-quartile (McKinsey, 2023)

Better decisions and innovation compound into financial results — when inclusion is genuine

 

Attracts top talent and strengthens reputation

Companies known for diverse teams and inclusive cultures don’t just widen their talent pool — they attract stronger candidates, because job seekers want to work where they feel accepted, valued, and empowered to succeed. The retention side is measurable: Great Place to Work’s research finds employees in inclusive workplaces are 5.4 times more likely to want to stay with their company long-term, which translates directly into lower turnover and a stronger employer brand (Great Place to Work, 2023).

Boosts creativity and innovation — under one condition

Diverse teams bring together people from different backgrounds, perspectives, and experiences, letting a team look at a problem from multiple angles — which is the basis for the widely-repeated claim that diversity drives innovation. But the research adds a crucial condition that the claim usually omits: diversity drives innovation only when psychological safety is present. Harvard’s Amy Edmondson established that teams perform when members feel safe to speak up, disagree, and take interpersonal risks (Edmondson, 1999), and Google’s large-scale Project Aristotle study found psychological safety to be the single strongest predictor of team effectiveness (Google re:Work, 2017). Diversity supplies the range of perspectives; psychological safety is what lets them surface. A diverse team where people don’t feel safe to contribute often underperforms a homogeneous one — which is exactly why inclusion, not just representation, is the work that matters.

 

The distinction that makes or breaks D&I

Diversity is the mix of people; inclusion is whether they can contribute fully. The research is consistent and important: diversity delivers its benefits only when paired with genuine inclusion. Hiring diverse people into a culture where they don’t feel safe to speak up doesn’t produce the innovation or retention gains — it can erode them. This is why ‘build inclusion’ is an active practice, not a hiring statistic.

 

Pushes employees to reach their full potential

When leadership genuinely prioritizes inclusion, employees feel empowered to share ideas freely — which drives both individual growth and project success. Those who feel they can’t speak up tend to dim their ideas and second-guess their ability, and the organization loses the contribution. The engagement effect is large and documented: Great Place to Work’s research finds employees in inclusive workplaces are 9.8 times more likely to look forward to going to work, 6.3 times more likely to have pride in their work, and 5.4 times more likely to want to stay a long time (Great Place to Work, 2023). A truly inclusive workplace doesn’t just hire diverse employees — it empowers them to lead, contribute, and thrive.

From ‘why’ to ‘how’: building inclusion in practice

Most articles on this topic stop at the business case. But the research is clear that representation alone doesn’t deliver the benefits — inclusion has to be actively built. The table below maps practical inclusion-building actions to what each addresses:

 

Practice

What it builds

Build psychological safety deliberately

The condition that unlocks diverse perspectives. Leaders model it by inviting dissent, responding to mistakes with curiosity rather than blame, and ensuring quieter voices are heard in meetings (Edmondson, 1999).

Make recognition equitable

Concrete, visible inclusion. Recognition tends to flow to the most visible people; tracking and correcting its distribution ensures contributions across the whole team are valued — see the recognition-equity section below.

Create real influence, not just representation

Genuine inclusion. Ensure diverse employees have decision-making roles and their input visibly shapes outcomes — inclusion is being asked to dance, not just invited to the party.

Measure inclusion, don’t assume it

Accountability. Inclusion indices, retention by group, and recognition-distribution data turn inclusion from an aspiration into something you can track and improve.

 

Recognition equity: inclusion you can actually measure

Recognition is one of the most direct — and most overlooked — levers on inclusion, and it’s where Rewardian sees the issue most concretely. Recognition has a hidden equity problem: managers tend to recognize the people most visible to them, which can systematically disadvantage quieter contributors, remote and frontline staff, and underrepresented groups. The result is that recognition, which should reinforce that everyone’s contribution is valued, can quietly do the opposite.

Recognition equity analytics make this visible and fixable. By reporting how recognition is distributed across teams, managers, and — where employees have consented to share the data — demographic groups, an organization can see whether appreciation is actually reaching everyone who earns it, and correct the gaps where it isn’t. Rewardian’s platform data shows that simply making recognition-distribution data visible to managers measurably evens out how recognition is distributed within their teams over the following quarter (Rewardian Platform Analytics, 2024). That is inclusion made concrete: not a statement of values, but a measured practice that ensures the people doing the work are seen for it.

 

Inclusion shows up in who gets recognized

If you want one practical, measurable place to start on inclusion, look at your recognition data. Who is being recognized, and who is being overlooked? The pattern is usually invisible until you measure it — and once you do, it’s one of the most directly fixable inclusion gaps an organization has.

 

Summary

Diversity and inclusion matter for both human and business reasons, and the evidence for the business case is strong: inclusive workplaces attract and retain talent, generate more innovation, and perform better. But the research is equally clear on the condition: those benefits depend on genuine inclusion, not representation alone — and inclusion depends on psychological safety and on the everyday practices, like equitable recognition, that signal every contribution is valued. A truly inclusive workplace doesn’t just hire diverse employees; it builds the conditions — measurably — that let them lead, contribute, and thrive.

 

Want to see whether recognition is reaching everyone on your team equally?

Inclusion shows up in the data — including in who gets recognized and who gets overlooked. Rewardian’s recognition analytics let you see how recognition is distributed across teams, managers, and (where consented) demographic groups, so you can spot and close the recognition gaps that quietly undermine inclusion. If you want to make inclusion a measured part of your culture rather than an aspiration, we’d love to show you how recognition equity analytics work.

→ Book a free Rewardian demo

 

 

Sources

1. Great Place to Work. (2023). Why Diversity and Inclusion in the Workplace Is Important. Inclusive-workplace employee outcomes: 9.8x more likely to look forward to work, 6.3x more likely to have pride in their work, 5.4x more likely to stay long-term.

2. McKinsey & Company. (2023). Diversity Matters Even More: The Case for Holistic Impact. The multi-year research series linking executive team diversity to the likelihood of above-average profitability.

3. Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological Safety and Learning Behavior in Work Teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2). Foundational research on psychological safety as the condition that lets diverse teams perform.

4. Google re:Work / Project Aristotle. (2017). The five keys to a successful Google team. Large-scale internal study identifying psychological safety as the top predictor of team effectiveness.

5. Rewardian Platform Analytics. (2024). Recognition Equity Benchmarks: Distribution of Recognition Across Teams, Managers, and Consented Demographic Groups, and the Effect of Equity Reporting on Distribution. Internal data from recognition programs with 200–5,000 employees, 2022–2024.



Substantially rewritten June 18, 2026. This version preserves and properly attributes the original Great Place to Work statistics, adds the McKinsey diversity-and-performance research and the psychological-safety evidence (Edmondson 1999; Google Project Aristotle 2017) that the business-case claims require, adds a benefits-with-evidence table and an inclusion-building actions table, and develops the recognition-equity angle with Rewardian data. The framing is evidence-based: it presents what the research shows, including the important nuance that diversity delivers benefits only when paired with genuine inclusion. Original publish date: September 9, 2020.

Barry Gallagher
Barry is Head of Content Strategy at Rewardian, where he covers employee recognition program design, sales incentive strategy, and HR technology. He has spent eight years working with mid-market HR and sales operations teams on recognition and incentive program architecture.

RELATED ARTICLES